I take pre and post assessments and measure the comparative differences. Know too that no two brains are alike, and the QEEG brain mapping assessment allows us to look directly at your brain live, enables a concrete analysis of your issues, and removes any guessing as to what needs to be done to get healthier. With IBH model, your brain is assessed and a personalized treatment protocol is obtained. I developed this approach of care ~ “integrative brain health” (IBH) where YOU and your brain direct the journey to a healthier you. Thus, effective therapy that produces quality results needs to start with the brain. The ability to heal resides in our amazing plastic brains that change themselves. Our state of health and wellbeing all begins in our brains. My primary means to get you healthier is YOU, that is a “self-regulated” you! I use mind-body medicine (MBM) as well as other models of medicine and healing to support people in optimizing their own innate healing capabilities and be whole. Please help me.I am a health psychology therapist, an integrative health coach, neurofeedback practitioner, meditation trainer, reiki master, and cancer survivor/thriver. By the way, I have read the manual, it says the pore-pressure distribution corresponds to an initial state for which there is no strain in fixed pore-pressure mode(I have attached this part). But whatever the pore-pressure defined, the strain increment seems to be zero. It generate a simple cube, give a normal stress, and then define the pore-pressure, to test the strain increment, assuming the pore-pressure is exported from TOUGH2. Is my learning wrong? I attach a simple example just made by FLAC3D. The result is same, I can't generate the strain. So I don't use the data from TOUGH2 but define the pore-pressure in FLAC3D by myself and try again. And I can give the gridpoint pore-pressure in FLAC3D some value to carry on a test. As I import the pore-pressure from TOUGH2's mesh to FLAC3D's mesh, the data has transferred from mesh's middle position to gridpoint. But the strain generated is too small so I consider it is zero. As a minimal test, I only consider the pore-pressure, but ignore the thermal effect. I think I should keep the pore-pressure constant while calculating the stress and strain, so I don't configure fluid mode in FLAC3D. I generate a initial state by TOUGH2, and import data to FLAC3D to calculate the effective stress and strain increment in this time step. I use a coupling method which is called fixed-stress split in related articles.

Learning flac3d